Jump to content

Talk:Antonio de La Gándara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Re. DW's query: I checked. Gandara, as a young artist - around 1884 - lived with his parents and brothers 10 rue d'Orchampt (Paris 18) on Montmartre. At that time, he was associated with the "Chat Noir" of Salis. It is only later that he became famous. PV.

Is this original work, or derived from another source? Can we fill in the full names of some of the people whose last names only are listed? -- Zoe

This guy, I think, will have to be removed from the Montmartre list of artists. As best I have found, and looking at the quoted age/success, he was a Paris elite artist and had nothing to do with the poverty stricken bunch in Montmartre who came there for the cheap rent. Someone should check it out....DW

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name issues

[edit]

We're being very inconsistent with his name. The title is "de La Gandara". The lede, however, starts out as "de la Gándara". We then refer to him as "La Gandara" (no accent on the first a), but in the next sentence as "Gandara". In the para that starts "Gandara illustrated a small number of publications ...", he's also referred to as "La Gandara", then as "Gandara" again. The next para has a similar issue.

So, is it:

  • A: Antonio de La Gandara (in which case his surname is La Gandara)
  • B: Antonio de la Gandara (in which case his surname is Gandara)
  • C: Antonio de La Gándara (in which case his surname is La Gándara), or
  • D: Antonio de la Gándara (in which case his surname is Gándara)?

The sequence of references in the text is A-D-A-B-B-B-A-B-B-A-B. The photo caption is version D.

External sources are not much help, as all 4 variants are found. We need to decide which variant is the one we want to use, and stick to it consistently.

Fwiw, I'd suggest the La (capital L) is part of his surname for sorting purposes. The only thing I'm not sure of is whether the a acute applies. That would have been the original Spanish spelling, but he was French. -- JackofOz (talk) 08:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@JackofOz: You're right, he was French, born in Paris. This accent in his surname makes no sense in French at all. Four years later you decided to move to the current title (with acute accent); you decided for this move based on what? if you don't have a strong argument in favor of the accented version, I'll suggest returning to the previous title. —capmo (talk) 23:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antonio de La Gándara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]