Talk:Google bombing
This is the talk page for discussing Google bombing and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Talk-page subpages: |
The article French military victories (practical joke) now redirects to Google bomb. Please merge any material if deemed relevant. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 14:41Z
Listed talk-page subpages here
[edit]14-Nov-2008: I have listed the known subpages (the archive files) in a wikitable (see Help:Table) beside the Table of Contents. I also shortened several auto-signature comments. -Wikid77 (talk) 03:43, 14 Nov 2008
Googlebombing as harassment
[edit]Another use, which might be argued as political but really is much more directed and personal than that, is to use the process as a way to harass people, notably bloggers but not needfully limited to that.
Here is a specific case detailed out, but which actually involves multiple targets of a convicted domestic terrorist by the name of Brett Kimberlin:
Convicted Bomber Brett Kimberlin, Neal Rauhauser, Ron Brynaert, and Their Campaign of Political Terrorism
http://patterico.com/2012/05/25/convicted-bomber-brett-kimberlin-neal-rauhauser-ron-brynaert-and-their-campaign-of-political-terrorism/
The googlebombing is only a specific sub-part of the story, which is a pretty obnoxious tale in itself.
Amber Heard Google Bomb?
[edit]Can someone consider the merit of an Amber Heard Google Bomb?
After the Depp Vs. Heard trial, if someone was to search the word "perjury", the first several images that appeared were of Amber Heard, this happened for several months after the trial results. MrScottBull (talk) 16:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The basic premise of "Google bombing" seems inaccurate, based on the first sentence in this article
[edit]"The terms Google bombing and Google washing refer to the practice of causing a website to rank highly in web search engine results for irrelevant, unrelated or off-topic search terms by linking heavily."
While this is often true, "linking heavily" is not the only approach, and the original approaches involved clicking, not linking. I am going to either delete "by linking heavily" or clarify that there are a variety of tactics that can be used. Reddit is an example of more recent effective Google bombing, and using Reddit is not a form of "linking heavily". Open to any thoughts on this before I make this edit. Dflovett (talk) 19:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Google articles
- Mid-importance Google articles
- WikiProject Google articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Mid-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Mid-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press